Question 3

Correct answer: A

A. Setting up a new custom admin role that specifically restricts eDiscovery access to executive communications for senior legal officers aligns with the new internal policy. This configuration ensures that only senior legal officers have the necessary permissions to view eDiscovery results for cases involving executive communication, thus adhering to the stricter delegation protocols.

B. Redefining the super admin role to restrict it to senior legal officers for the purpose of eDiscovery may not be the most appropriate solution as the super admin role typically has broad access across the entire Google Workspace environment. Creating a new custom admin role with specific restrictions related to eDiscovery for senior legal officers would be a more targeted and effective approach to adhere to the new policy.

C. Adjusting the sharing settings of all executive communications to include only senior legal officers may limit access to these communications, but it does not specifically address the eDiscovery results for cases involving executive communication. This approach may not provide the necessary granularity and control required by the new internal policy.

D. Creating a Google Group for senior legal officers and assigning it the necessary Vault privileges can help streamline access control, but it does not directly address the requirement of restricting eDiscovery results for cases involving executive communication. This method may not provide the level of access control and restriction needed to comply with the new delegation protocols.