Github Foundations · Free Practice Question Easy
Question 20
Thomas is a developer who frequently reviews code changes and wants a way to provide a quick and positive response such as Looks great, I approve of the changes 🚀 What can Thomas use to express approval of the changes without the need for typing the same response over and over?
-
A
GitHub Discussions
-
B
GitHub Project Board
-
C
GitHub Saved Replies
-
D
GitHub Actions
Reveal correct answer
Correct answer: C
Explanation
GitHub Save Replies allows you to save and reuse responses. In this scenario, you can use a saved reply like Looks great, I approve of the changes 🚀 for a quick and positive response.
********************
WRONG ANSWERS:
GitHub Discussions are threaded conversations and may not be the most efficient way for a quick and specific approval response.
GitHub Project Boards are used for visualizing and managing project tasks, not for providing quick replies to pull requests.
GitHub Actions are primarily for automating workflows and tasks, not for providing quick replies to pull requests.
A. GitHub Discussions is a feature that enables community conversations around repositories. It is not specifically designed for providing quick responses or expressing approval of code changes. Therefore, it is not the suitable option for Thomas to use in this case.
B. GitHub Project Board is a tool used to organize and prioritize work on GitHub. It is not designed for providing quick responses or expressing approval of code changes. Therefore, it is not the appropriate option for Thomas to use in this scenario.
C. GitHub Saved Replies allow users to save and reuse common responses for code reviews, issues, and pull requests. Thomas can use Saved Replies to quickly express approval of code changes without the need to type the same response repeatedly, making the review process more efficient.
D. GitHub Actions is a feature that automates workflows in GitHub repositories. While it can be used to automate certain tasks related to code reviews, it is not specifically designed for providing quick responses or expressing approval of code changes. Therefore, it is not the best option for Thomas in this situation.
Discussion
Think the marked answer is wrong, or have a better explanation? Share it below — comments appear after review.
