Dynatrace Associate · Free Practice Question Medium
Question 3
When designing a Dynatrace deployment for a global enterprise with multiple data sovereignty requirements, which architectural approach best balances comprehensive monitoring with regional data compliance?
-
A
Federated Dynatrace clusters with appropriate data handling policies
-
B
A single global Dynatrace deployment with data aggregation
-
C
Selective monitoring that excludes sensitive regions
-
D
Independent Dynatrace deployments in each region with no cross-region visibility
Reveal correct answer
Correct answer: A
Explanation
Federated Dynatrace clusters with appropriate data handling policies best balances comprehensive monitoring with regional data compliance for global enterprises. This approach allows dedicated Dynatrace environments in each region to maintain data within required geographical boundaries while still providing cross-cluster visibility and reporting.
Discussion
Think the marked answer is wrong, or have a better explanation? Share it below — comments appear after review.
